Intersection arguments finite and infinite

If we define a head segment as 0 to n, and a tail as n to infinity, both including n, we see something interesting on intersections.

The tail starting at 2 is the intersection of the tail starting at 0, starting at 1 and starting at 2.  Thus 2′ sets.

The head ending at 2 is the intersection of every

head that ends at 2 or afterwards, an infinite number.

If we go from 2 to 5, then we take the intersections of
all tails starting from 0, 1 or 2, and all heads that end at 5 or later.

At some point in every approach from Dedekind on, we have a point where we do one of these intersections.

Standard treatments do an intersection approach for the proof of the recursion theorem.   This is usually complicated and difficult to understand.

Dedekind was the first to have some sort of intersection stage.

One can gain insight by determining what intersection of what sets is being used.

Advertisements

About New Math Done Right

Author of Pre-Algebra New Math Done Right Peano Axioms. A below college level self study book on the Peano Axioms and proofs of the associative and commutative laws of addition. President of Mathematical Finance Company. Provides economic scenario generators to financial institutions.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s