Search “counting on” “definition of addition”

“definition of addition” “counting on”

About 6,430 results (0.32 seconds)

“definition of addition” “counting on”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addition

 

Understanding Numbers in Elementary School Mathematics
By Hung-Hsi Wu, Hongxi Wu

http://www.meridianschools.org/Staff/DistrictCurriculum/MoreResources/Math/All%20Grades/Misconceptions_Error%202%5B1%5D.pdf

ftp://math.stanford.edu/pub/papers/milgram/class-notes-foundations.pdf

https://scholar.vt.edu/access/content/user/wilkins/Public/JECP_2001.pdf

When we search on

addition “counting on”

we get hits where “counting on” is described as a strategy instead of as a definition.

http://www.brainpopjr.com/math/additionandsubtraction/countingon/grownups.weml

About 5,280,000 results (0.34 seconds)

Counting on is understood widely as a method but not as a definition it would appear.

The hits on the broader search are lower level in abstraction. The first search with definition give us more university type hits.

Cardinality of sets as a definition of addition seems more popular than recursion as in the Peano Axioms.

The cardinality of the union of two sets of disparate elements as the definition of sum has potential pitfalls that we may carry over physical ideas to the definition or proofs of properties.

If we use cardinality as the definition, do we have to use proof by induction? What is done? For example for associativity or commutativity?

What about going from right additive identities to left additive? Or proving the right additive in the first place? Do these require induction in cardinality?

Do we have to prove the recursion theorem first for cardinality? If so how?

Order first with cardinality?

Cardinality seems to be preferred as being closer to physical ideas and manipulatives.

Advertisements

About New Math Done Right

Author of Pre-Algebra New Math Done Right Peano Axioms. A below college level self study book on the Peano Axioms and proofs of the associative and commutative laws of addition. President of Mathematical Finance Company. Provides economic scenario generators to financial institutions.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s